Peer Review & Editorial Policy
Neewaj is committed to rigorous, transparent, and fair peer review designed to meet the best-practice criteria of major indexing services.
1
Peer Review Model
- Double-Blind Review: Our default model is double-blind peer review, meaning reviewer and author identities are hidden from each other. Authors must fully anonymize their main manuscript files prior to submission.
- Exceptions: Any deviation from this model (e.g., open review for specific article types) will be clearly stated on the journal’s submission page.
2
Editorial Workflow & Governance
- Initial Check: The editorial office screens submissions for scope, formatting, ethical compliance, and plagiarism. Manuscripts failing these checks are returned prior to review.
- Review Process: Manuscripts are assigned to an Editor who selects at least two independent expert reviewers. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript's novelty, methodology, ethics, and clarity.
- Editorial Decision: The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision (Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject) based on reviewer recommendations. Editorial decisions are completely independent of commercial influence, APC waiver status, or publisher interference.
3
Ethics, Integrity & Misconduct
Neewaj strictly adheres to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines.
- Conflicts of Interest: Editors and reviewers must recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where a real or perceived conflict of interest exists.
- Misconduct Investigations: Allegations of data fabrication, image manipulation, plagiarism, or authorship disputes are investigated confidentially by the editorial office. We may notify the authors' institutions or funders depending on the findings.
- Corrections & Retractions: Honest errors will be addressed with a published Correction (Erratum/Corrigendum). Severe ethical breaches or unreliable findings will result in a formal Retraction, which will remain linked to the original article in the scholarly record.
4
Appeals & Complaints
- Appeals: Authors may formally appeal a rejection by emailing the Editor-in-Chief with supporting evidence. Appeals are reviewed by senior editors not involved in the original decision.
- Complaints: Concerns regarding editorial conduct, reviewer behaviour, or policy compliance should be directed to editorial@neewaj.com. Investigations will be conducted impartially and confidentially.
Have inquiries or concerns?
For editorial inquiries or to report an ethics concern, please contact our office.